Fire Emblem Heroes made 115 million dollars in 6months, currently 500K per day

1. Boards
2. Nintendo Switch 
3. Fire Emblem Heroes made 115 million dollars in 6months, currently 500K per day

arrrdunla 4 hours ago#1 Great news! Nintendo is in such a great position now. Sorry guys but Nintendo won't be going third party anytime soon. Hopefully this means more money for the full fledge sequel on Switch. (edited 4 hours ago)

ReggieCeo 4 hours ago#2 arrrdunla posted... Hopefully this means more money for the full fledge sequel on Switch. Or use that money for other games instead. Hopefully Animal Crossing or maybe revive old franchises Nothing to see here! Move along folks!! (edited 3 hours ago)

Latino_King 3 hours ago#3 I bet I had something to do with that, especially from all the orbs I've brought. Damn you, Waifu Emblem. AKA 305_King "Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." -Confucius

sylawaatch 3 hours ago#4 Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

Brando11 3 hours ago#5 sylawaatch posted... Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. Pretty sure people already explained why you were wrong on that. AGAIN.

PS4Warrior 3 hours ago#6 Latino_King posted... I bet I had something to do with that, especially from all the orbs I've brought. Damn you, Waifu Emblem. Look what you did! PS4 - Because it was the next gen console i was the most interested in. Warrior - Because i usually pick the Warrior class in MMORPGs when i played them.

JustABox 3 hours ago#7 arrrdunla posted... Hopefully this means more money for the full fledge sequel on Switch. Are you saying you want Nintendo to put a microtransaction game on the Switch? Or just a Fire Emblem game? Because you have a Fire Emblem game coming next year. Favorite series: Tales Of, Valkyria Chronicles, Trails of Cold Steel, Corpse Party, God Eater, Resident Evil Still foolishly hoping for Skies of Arcadia sequel

Maverick_Reznor 3 hours ago#8 Brando11 posted... sylawaatch posted... Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. Pretty sure people already explained why you were wrong on that. AGAIN. he's just a pessimist He knows he is wrong, but he is so bitter that he doesn't care. Currently Playing :The Legend of Zelda :Majoras Mask (N64) & Final Fantasy XII The Zodiac Age

sylawaatch 3 hours ago#9 Maverick_Reznor posted... Brando11 posted... sylawaatch posted... Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. Pretty sure people already explained why you were wrong on that. AGAIN. he's just a pessimist He knows he is wrong, but he is so bitter that he doesn't care. Not a he first of all. And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million.  Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. Even though it is unlike Fire Emblem. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

Junior_AIN 3 hours ago#10 Fire Emblem Heroes Deluxe. + | + https://marcoagj.wordpress.com/ + | + | | | | https://miiverse.nintendo.net/users/Marco_AGJ | | | |

Maverick_Reznor 3 hours ago#11 sylawaatch posted... Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. actually people are already saying that it is big. Even bigger than fire emblem. so...... lol, you got dumped on twice Currently Playing :The Legend of Zelda :Majoras Mask (N64) & Final Fantasy XII The Zodiac Age

sylawaatch 3 hours ago#12 Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. actually people are already saying that it is big. Even bigger than fire emblem. so...... lol, you got dumped on twice Look at the Splatoon vs Fire Emblem topic. Get rekt. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

The_shoemaker 3 hours ago#13 sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... Brando11 posted... sylawaatch posted... Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. Pretty sure people already explained why you were wrong on that. AGAIN. he's just a pessimist He knows he is wrong, but he is so bitter that he doesn't care. Not a he first of all. And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million.  Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. Even though it is unlike Fire Emblem. But of course, the budget for this game is likely no where near the budget of a $60 game. Visit This Old Neon - A friendly civilized gaming forum.

arrrdunla (Topic Creator)3 hours ago#14 sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... Brando11 posted... sylawaatch posted... Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. Pretty sure people already explained why you were wrong on that. AGAIN. he's just a pessimist He knows he is wrong, but he is so bitter that he doesn't care. Not a he first of all. And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million.  Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. Even though it is unlike Fire Emblem. Nobody even mention anything about Splatoon. The idea of the mobile titles is to create constant revenue like how fire emblem heroes is bringing in 500K every single day. And god knows how much pokemon go is generating for Nintendo. This constant revenue from mobile titles is easier to sustain than console titles which are usually more launch heavy.

sylawaatch 3 hours ago#15 The_shoemaker posted... sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... Brando11 posted... sylawaatch posted... Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. Pretty sure people already explained why you were wrong on that. AGAIN. he's just a pessimist He knows he is wrong, but he is so bitter that he doesn't care. Not a he first of all. And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million.  Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. Even though it is unlike Fire Emblem. But of course, the budget for this game is likely no where near the budget of a $60 game. It seems to have a high budget for mobile. Don't forget the big cuts Google and Apple take, I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

sylawaatch 3 hours ago#16 arrrdunla posted... sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... Brando11 posted... sylawaatch posted... Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. Pretty sure people already explained why you were wrong on that. AGAIN. he's just a pessimist He knows he is wrong, but he is so bitter that he doesn't care. Not a he first of all. And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million.  Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. Even though it is unlike Fire Emblem. Nobody even mention anything about Splatoon. The idea of the mobile titles is to create constant revenue like how fire emblem heroes is bringing in 500K every single day. And god knows how much pokemon go is generating for Nintendo. This constant revenue from mobile titles is easier to sustain than console titles which are usually more launch heavy. Pokemon Go has made about 1.2 billion and fizzled out fast. Nintendo has released retail games that have made much more and are still making money. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

Maverick_Reznor 3 hours ago#17 sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. actually people are already saying that it is big. Even bigger than fire emblem. so...... lol, you got dumped on twice Look at the Splatoon vs Fire Emblem topic. Get rekt. I did Not only is it beating out Fire Emblem, its beating out Fire Emblem and Metroid together. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/189706-nintendo-switch/75583566 Lol @sylawaatch, you are trying too hard just to end up getting dumped on. Currently Playing :The Legend of Zelda :Majoras Mask (N64) & Final Fantasy XII The Zodiac Age

sylawaatch 3 hours ago#18 Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. actually people are already saying that it is big. Even bigger than fire emblem. so...... lol, you got dumped on twice Look at the Splatoon vs Fire Emblem topic. Get rekt. I did Not only is it beating out Fire Emblem, its beating out Fire Emblem and Metroid together. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/189706-nintendo-switch/75583566 Lol @sylawaatch, you are trying too hard just to end up getting dumped on. I never said it wasn'the winning troll. I said that there are a lot of people arguing for FE and always parading it's mediocre popularity even though Splatoon is actually big and not paraded as such. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

Maverick_Reznor 3 hours ago#19 sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. actually people are already saying that it is big. Even bigger than fire emblem. so...... lol, you got dumped on twice Look at the Splatoon vs Fire Emblem topic. Get rekt. I did Not only is it beating out Fire Emblem, its beating out Fire Emblem and Metroid together. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/189706-nintendo-switch/75583566 Lol @sylawaatch, you are trying too hard just to end up getting dumped on. I never said it wasn'the winning troll. I said that there are a lot of people arguing for FE and always parading it's mediocre popularity even though Splatoon is actually big and not paraded as such. You also said they you won't see people saying how big Splatoon is, and obviously you were horribly wrong....again. Currently Playing :The Legend of Zelda :Majoras Mask (N64) & Final Fantasy XII The Zodiac Age

sylawaatch 2 hours ago#20 Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... sylawaatch posted... Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. actually people are already saying that it is big. Even bigger than fire emblem. so...... lol, you got dumped on twice Look at the Splatoon vs Fire Emblem topic. Get rekt. I did Not only is it beating out Fire Emblem, its beating out Fire Emblem and Metroid together. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/189706-nintendo-switch/75583566 Lol @sylawaatch, you are trying too hard just to end up getting dumped on. I never said it wasn'the winning troll. I said that there are a lot of people arguing for FE and always parading it's mediocre popularity even though Splatoon is actually big and not paraded as such. You also said they you won't see people saying how big Splatoon is, and obviously you were horribly wrong....again. They only say it's big when asked. You don't see people making three topics of the same thing, which isn't even that impressive in the first place. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

587Deathking 2 hours ago#21 And I gave another 20 to them trying to get Ninian Reading internet jokes- http://tinyurl.com/qdxttnh Reading a poorly written argument- http://tinyurl.com/o3f3nne

MWXIII 2 hours ago#22 arrrdunla posted... Great news! Nintendo is in such a great position now. Sorry guys but Nintendo won't be going third party anytime soon. Hopefully this means more money for the full fledge sequel on Switch. So you're logic is Nintendo is making a ton of money by releasing a game on a non Nintendo console, so they won't go third party. Lol Karma, Truth, Vengeance PSN - MWXIII NSW- 772023730916 Steam - TyrXIII/Tyr Above All B.Net - MWXIII

Starwars4J 2 hours ago#23 sylawaatch posted... And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million You think anyone actually gets close to the 59.99 on a full price retail game? lol What I can't get over is how she ripped one testicle off..~Frogstir I can't read your topics without expecting Bel Air now.~KensaiBlade

MWXIII 2 hours ago#24 arrrdunla posted... sylawaatch posted... Maverick_Reznor posted... Brando11 posted... sylawaatch posted... Already posted and not impressive as I pointed out in the other topic. Pretty sure people already explained why you were wrong on that. AGAIN. he's just a pessimist He knows he is wrong, but he is so bitter that he doesn't care. Not a he first of all. And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million.  Splatoon 2 will make that amount first week and you wont here people on this board screaming that Splatoon is oh so big. Even though it is unlike Fire Emblem. Nobody even mention anything about Splatoon. The idea of the mobile titles is to create constant revenue like how fire emblem heroes is bringing in 500K every single day. And god knows how much pokemon go is generating for Nintendo. This constant revenue from mobile titles is easier to sustain than console titles which are usually more launch heavy. Nintendo didn't make Pokemon go and doesn't own pokemon Karma, Truth, Vengeance PSN - MWXIII NSW- 772023730916 Steam - TyrXIII/Tyr Above All B.Net - MWXIII

sylawaatch 2 hours ago#25 Starwars4J posted... sylawaatch posted... And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million You think anyone actually gets close to the 59.99 on a full price retail game? lol Do you not understand what revenue means? I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

PS4Warrior 2 hours ago#26 MWXIII posted... arrrdunla posted... Great news! Nintendo is in such a great position now. Sorry guys but Nintendo won't be going third party anytime soon. Hopefully this means more money for the full fledge sequel on Switch. So you're logic is Nintendo is making a ton of money by releasing a game on a non Nintendo console, so they won't go third party. Lol This proves Nintendo should go 3rd party! PS4 - Because it was the next gen console i was the most interested in. Warrior - Because i usually pick the Warrior class in MMORPGs when i played them.

Chemazan 2 hours ago#27 Nothing gets the message "we want more quality games" to corporations better than a s***ty freemium mobile game making millions of moneyz

The_Undying_84 2 hours ago#28 What's really crazy about these s***ty freemium mobile games is when you look at the percentage of players who spend ANYTHING. It's like 1% for most of them. Which means they're making this much money off just a handful of people.  It really is like that South Park episode where Stan bankrupts the family playing one. sylawaatch posted... Starwars4J posted... sylawaatch posted... And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million You think anyone actually gets close to the 59.99 on a full price retail game? lol Do you not understand what revenue means? No, most people have no idea what the difference between revenue and profit is. But to be fair you didn't actually specify, you just said amount of money made which could mean either. PSN: TheUndying84 (edited 2 hours ago)

KaiRyusaki 2 hours ago#29 sylawaatch posted... Starwars4J posted... sylawaatch posted... And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million You think anyone actually gets close to the 59.99 on a full price retail game? lol Do you not understand what revenue means? Nintendo literally does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game, unless it's digital.

sylawaatch 2 hours ago#30 KaiRyusaki posted... sylawaatch posted... Starwars4J posted... sylawaatch posted... And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million You think anyone actually gets close to the 59.99 on a full price retail game? lol Do you not understand what revenue means? Nintendo literally does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game, unless it's digital. That has nothing to do with what I said. I never said anything about profit and the OP isn't profit related either. This is basic ECON 101. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif (edited 2 hours ago)

KaiRyusaki 2 hours ago#31 sylawaatch posted... KaiRyusaki posted... sylawaatch posted... Starwars4J posted... sylawaatch posted... And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million You think anyone actually gets close to the 59.99 on a full price retail game? lol Do you not understand what revenue means? Nintendo literally does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game, unless it's digital. That has nothing to do with what I said. I never said anything about profit and the OP isn't profit related either. This is basic ECON 101. I never said anything about profit either. I said Nintendo does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game (retail). This is basic ENG 101.

sylawaatch 2 hours ago#32 KaiRyusaki posted... sylawaatch posted... KaiRyusaki posted... sylawaatch posted... Starwars4J posted... sylawaatch posted... And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million You think anyone actually gets close to the 59.99 on a full price retail game? lol Do you not understand what revenue means? Nintendo literally does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game, unless it's digital. That has nothing to do with what I said. I never said anything about profit and the OP isn't profit related either. This is basic ECON 101. I never said anything about profit either. I said Nintendo does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game (retail). This is basic ENG 101. That is irrelevant. A $60 game makes $60 off each game sold. Period. End of story. Look up what revenue means. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

KaiRyusaki 2 hours ago#33 sylawaatch posted... KaiRyusaki posted... sylawaatch posted... KaiRyusaki posted... sylawaatch posted... Starwars4J posted... sylawaatch posted... And lol 115 milliom is the same amount of money made from a 59.99 title selling 1.6 million You think anyone actually gets close to the 59.99 on a full price retail game? lol Do you not understand what revenue means? Nintendo literally does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game, unless it's digital. That has nothing to do with what I said. I never said anything about profit and the OP isn't profit related either. This is basic ECON 101. I never said anything about profit either. I said Nintendo does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game (retail). This is basic ENG 101. That is irrelevant. A $60 game makes $60 off each game sold. Period. End of story. Look up what revenue means. The store selling the game for $60 makes $60 revenue. Not the company that makes the product. By the way, being smug is not a good way to learn new knowledge.

sylawaatch 2 hours ago#34 KaiRyusaki posted... sylawaatch posted... KaiRyusaki posted... I never said anything about profit either. I said Nintendo does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game (retail). This is basic ENG 101. That is irrelevant. A $60 game makes $60 off each game sold. Period. End of story. Look up what revenue means. The store selling the game for $60 makes $60 revenue. Not the company that makes the product. By the way, being smug is not a good way to learn new knowledge. This is literally revenue. Look at the source. Stop acting thick. No one ever mentioned profit. I woke up like dih! http://abload.de/img/1255ns2d.gif

KaiRyusaki 2 hours ago#35 sylawaatch posted... KaiRyusaki posted... sylawaatch posted... KaiRyusaki posted... I never said anything about profit either. I said Nintendo does not get $60 when you buy a $60 game (retail). This is basic ENG 101. That is irrelevant. A $60 game makes $60 off each game sold. Period. End of story. Look up what revenue means. The store selling the game for $60 makes $60 revenue. Not the company that makes the product. By the way, being smug is not a good way to learn new knowledge. This is literally revenue. Look at the source. Stop acting thick. No one ever mentioned profit. I'm not talking about profit, I don't know why you keep bringing it up. Only the retailer makes $60 revenue. The product-makers makes less because they sell it at less, and then subtracts deductions depending on situations (sales). I only know this because unfortunately, it's my crappy job (not at a video game company though) Seriously, acting smug is bad for you.

moogle69 2 hours ago#36 Well its an addictive game 3DSXL FC: 0087-3600-6980 Hyped: LOH:TOCSIII, Xenoblade 2, SMO, Splatoon 2, KHIII

1. Boards
2. Nintendo Switch 
3. Fire Emblem Heroes made 115 million dollars in 6months, currently 500K per day